4.4 Article

How dental team members describe adverse events

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 147, Issue 10, Pages 803-811

Publisher

AMER DENTAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2016.04.015

Keywords

Adverse event; dentistry; never event; cause; classification

Funding

  1. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health [1R01DE022628-01A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Although some patients experience adverse events (AEs) resulting in harm caused by treatments in dentistry, few published reports have detailed how dental providers describe these events. Understanding how dental treatment professionals view AEs is essential to building a safer environment in dental practice. Methods. The authors interviewed dental professionals and domain experts through focus groups and in-depth interviews and asked them to identify the types of AEs that may occur in dental settings. Results. The initial interview and focus group findings yielded 1,514 items that included both causes and AEs. In total, 632 causes were coded into 1 of the 8 categories of the Eindhoven classification, and 882 AEs were coded into 12 categories of a newly developed dental AE classification. Interrater reliability was moderate among coders. The list was reanalyzed, and duplicate items were removed leaving a total of 747 unique AEs and 540 causes. The most frequently identified AE types were aspiration and ingestion at 14% (n = 142), wrong-site, wrong-procedure, wrong-patient errors at 13%, hard-tissue damage at 13%, and soft-tissue damage at 12%. Conclusions. Dental providers identified a large and diverse list of AEs. These events ranged from death due to cardiac arrest to jaw fatigue from lengthy procedures. Practical Implications. Identifying threats to patient safety is a key element of improving dental patient safety. An inventory of dental AEs underpins efforts to track, prevent, and mitigate these events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available