4.7 Article

Effective properties of a fly ash geopolymer: Synergistic application of X-ray synchrotron tomography, nanoindentation, and homogenization models

Journal

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages 252-262

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.08.004

Keywords

Alkali activated cement; Fly ash; Backscattered electron imaging; Micromechanics; X-ray tomography

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CMMI: 1068985, CMMI: 1353170]
  2. Laboratory for the Science of Sustainable Infrastructural Materials
  3. Structural Engineering Laboratory
  4. Mechanical Behavior of Materials Facility
  5. 4D Materials Science Laboratory at Arizona State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microstructural and micromechanical investigation of a fly ash-based geopolymer using: (i) synchrotron X-ray tomography (XRT) to determine the volume fraction and tortuosity of pores that are influential in fluid transport, (ii) mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) to capture the volume fraction of smaller pores, (iii) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) combined with multi-label thresholding to identify and characterize the solid phases in the microstructure, and (iv) nanoindentation to determine the component phase elastic properties using statistical deconvolution, is reported in this paper. The phase volume fractions and elastic properties are used in multi-step mean field homogenization (Mod-Tanaka and double inclusion) models to determine the homogenized macroscale elastic modulus of the composite. The homogenized elastic moduli are in good agreement with the flexural elastic modulus determined on macroscale paste beams. The combined use of microstructural and micromechanical characterization tools at multiple scales provides valuable information towards the material design of fly ash geopolymers. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available