4.6 Article

Effect of Flexible Spacer and Alkyl Tail Length on the Liquid Crystalline Phase Behavior of Fullerene Block Molecules

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202301015

Keywords

block molecule; fullerene; liquid crystal; superlattice; self-assembly

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The supramolecular liquid crystalline behavior of fullerene block molecules was investigated based on spacer length, alkyl tail length, and temperature. Different lamellar LC phases were observed, including sandwich-like structures with multiple fullerene layers, and alternating soft hydrocarbon and fullerene layers. By designing molecules with a long spacer, the range of superlattice phase was effectively widened, allowing for the creation of novel superstructures.
Here the supramolecular liquid crystalline (LC) phase behavior of a series of fullerene block molecules was investigated regarding spacer length, alkyl tail length and temperature. These compounds exhibit several lamellar LC phases with different packings of self-organized fullerene two-dimensional (2D) crystals. With a short hexamethylene spacer, they form sandwich-like structures with triple or quadruple fullerene layers. By increasing the spacer length to 10 or 12 carbons, a composite layers-in-lamella superlattice structure with alternating soft hydrocarbon single layers and fullerene single or double layers was obtained. As the molecular configurational freedom between incompatible moieties was enhanced by the elongated spacer, the required cross-sectional fullerene-to-hydrocarbon ratio for the superlattice could be achieved despite of different volume fractions of the blocks. The superlattice phase range is efficiently widened by the design principle of constructing LC molecules with a long spacer, which also provides a facile way to tailor novel superstructures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available