4.6 Article

Negative Homotropic Cooperativity in Guest Binding of a Trisporphyrin Double Cleft

Journal

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202300107

Keywords

allosteric effects; cooperativity; molecular recognition; porphyrins; supramolecular chemistry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The negative homotropic allostery of a triple-layered trisporphyrin cleft with two guest binding sites is confirmed. The trisporphyrin can accommodate two guest molecules within the cleft through pi-pi stacking and donor-acceptor interactions. The binding of the first guest by the trisporphyrin incurs an enthalpy penalty that weakens the successive binding process, as revealed by experimental and computational studies.
The negative homotropic allostery of a triple-layered trisporphyrin cleft with two guest binding sites is confirmed. The X-ray crystal structures of the 1 : 2 host-guest complexes showed that the trisporphyrin accommodated two guest molecules within the cleft through pi-pi stacking and donor-acceptor interactions. In solution, H-1 NMR and Job plots showed 1 : 2 host-guest complexes. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and UV/vis absorption spectroscopy were employed to evaluate the binding constants and cooperativities. The guest binding of the trisporphyrin showed negative cooperativity and non-cooperativity depending on the structures of the guest molecules. The correlations between the interaction parameters (alpha) and Hill constants were determined. ITC experiments showed that the host-guest complexation of trisporphyrin with electron-deficient guests incurred an enthalpy penalty in the successive guest binding process. DFT calculations revealed that binding of the first guest reduced the electron density of the central porphyrin plane, which led to an energetic penalty that weakened the successive binding process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available