4.8 Article

Hexagonal Tungsten Bronze H0.25Cs0.25Nb2.5W2.5O14 as a Negative Electrode Material for Li-Ion Batteries

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 35, Issue 8, Pages 3162-3171

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c03797

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxides derived from the ReO3 structure, such as bronzes or Wadsley-Roth phases, have attractive properties as negative electrodes for Li-ion batteries. In this study, the hexagonal bronze Cs0.5Nb2.5W2.5O14 and its protonated H0.25Cs0.25Nb2.5W2.5O14 derivative were investigated. The protonated phase exhibited higher specific capacities and better capacity retention at high currents due to favorable lithium ion diffusion and a solid solution mechanism during lithium insertion.
Oxides derived from the ReO3 structure, such as bronzes or Wadsley-Roth phases, have re-emerged from the past as they offer very attractive properties as negative electrodes for high-power Li-ion batteries. Here, we revisit the hexagonal bronze Cs0.5Nb2.5W2.5O14 and its protonated H0.25Cs0.25Nb2.5W2.5O14 derivative, which was newly obtained after ion exchange. A panel of characterization techniques (HAADF-STEM imaging, EDX mapping, and XRD) revealed a specific cation ordering in the material and a preferential ion exchange in the heptagonal tunnels of this oxide. When used as Li-ion battery electrodes, H0.25Cs0.25Nb2.5W2.5O14 exhibits higher specific capacities as well as better capacity retention at high currents than Cs0.5Nb2.5W2.5O14. The protonated phase provides specific capacities of 132 and 111 mAh center dot g-1 at, respectively, 0.02 and 0.2 A center dot g-1. Kinetic analysis reveals that the good capacity at a high rate is due to favorable diffusion of lithium ions into the tunnels of H0.25Cs0.25Nb2.5W2.5O14. In addition, using in situ XRD, a solid solution mechanism occurring during lithium insertion was proposed, as well as the different lithiation sites of the material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available