4.8 Article

Imperfect Battery Materials: A Closer Look at the Role of Defects in Electrochemical Performance

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 35, Issue 9, Pages 3345-3363

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c03481

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding and controlling structural defects in crystalline materials is crucial for exploring composition-structure-property relationships. Recent advancements in structural disorder characterization techniques provide valuable insights and tools for accurately analyzing microstructural complexity. Mastering these techniques offers great potential for designing improved materials.
Structural and compositional defects in crystalline materials are unavoidable. Accurately disentangling their role in composition-structure-property correlations is therefore essential but has long been hindered by our inability to precisely identify and quantify certain microstructural features. As a result, deviations from ideal structures have frequently been disregarded or assumed to be detrimental. Nonetheless, today's structural disorder characterization advancements offer unprecedented insights into defect architectures. Recent models and tools applied to scattering and spectroscopic techniques provide an accessible window for observing and accurately parametrizing microstructural complexity and, if understood and mastered, offer the utmost control for designing better materials. One important field that can greatly benefit from advancement in the understanding and control of structural defects is the development of battery materials, whose performance and cycle life are closely related to structural aspects, including defects. This perspective offers an overview of the progress achieved in this field, with a special focus on cathode materials, and a discussion about opportunities for future developments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available