4.5 Article

Date Seeds (Phoenix dactylifera): Antioxidant Potential and Profile of Free and Bound Polyphenols from Different Cultivars

Journal

CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.202300179

Keywords

antioxidants; bound polyphenols; date palm seeds; free polyphenols; proanthocyanidins

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the antioxidant activities and phenolic profiling of extracts from seven cultivars of date seeds, and found significant variations among cultivars. The total phenolic content, total flavonoid value, and condensed tannin content differed among cultivars, and phloroglucinolysis revealed the presence of phenolic acids and a high amount of flavan-3-ols. Date seeds were identified as a good source of bioactive compounds.
In this study, the antioxidant activities and detailed phenolic profiling of extracts from seven cultivars of date seeds were investigated. Significant differences were detected among cultivars. Total phenolic content (TP) ranged between 135.9 +/- 12.1 and 284.86 +/- 21.9 mg GAE/g DM. The total flavonoid value varied between 34.20 +/- 0.34 and 94.46 +/- 1.04 mg RE/g DM. The condensed tannin ranged from 24.17 +/- 1.13 to 201.60 +/- 9.95 mg CTE/g DM. Phloroglucinolysis was used to depolymerize the bound polyphenols. Results show the presence of phenolic acids: Hydroxybenzoic acid, hydroxycinnamic acid, and a high amount of flavan-3ols (monomers, dimers, and trimers). Before depolymerization, the highest amount of total polyphenols was identified in Kenta (8.48 g/kg) and the lowest was detected in Hessa (4.74 g/kg). After depolymerization, the flavan-3-ols increased significantly, ranging between 46.91g/kg in Hessa and 72.38 g/kg in Deglet Nour, with a high degree of polymerization (DP) in all cultivars. It can be concluded that date seeds represent a good source of bioactive compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available