Oil and gas production from the pyrolytic transformation of recycled plastic waste: An integral study by polymer families

Different plastics recovered from a local urban solid waste plant were collected before landfilling, sepa-rated, and classified by families, i.e. polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), high impact and expanded polystyrene (HIPS and EPS, respectively), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC). A systematic pyrolysis study was carried out to compare the different behavior registered in each plastic type, and an integral analysis of the produced oils and synthetic gas was conducted. In general terms, the oil yield followed the order EPS > PP > PE > HIPS > PET > PVC, reaching maximum values over 500 degrees C after 1 h of treatment. The oil from HIPS, EPS, PET, and PP was rich in light compounds, i.e., C5-C9 hydrocarbons. Almost 100 % of the oil from HIPS and EPS pyrolysis was aromatic. The aromatic fraction was important in the case of PVC (57 %) and PET (45 %). PE produced an oil with the most varied distri-bution of compounds but rich in olefins (67 %). The analysis of the non-condensable composition of the gas showed that in all the pyrolysis gases methane was over 50 % (vol.), followed by ethane in impor-tance. CO was produced in the case of PET. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Automated summary

Different plastics from solid waste were sorted and analyzed by pyrolysis. The oil yield varied among different types of plastics, with EPS > PP > PE > HIPS > PET > PVC. The composition of the produced oils differed as well, with HIPS and EPS oils being aromatic, PVC and PET oils containing a significant amount of aromatics, and PE oil rich in olefins. Methane was the dominant gas component in all pyrolysis gases, followed by ethane.