4.6 Article

DDPM simulation of the erosion of immersed tubes in a pulsating fluidized bed

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Volume 269, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2023.118475

Keywords

Pulsating flow; Immersed tube erosion; Pressure drop stability; Power spectral density (PSD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effects of the type of pulsating inlet waveform, pulsation frequency, and pulsation amplitude on the stability of fluidized beds and the erosion of immersed tubes through numerical simulation. It was found that sinusoidal flow induced the lowest immersed-tube erosion rate and pressure-drop fluctuation in the fluidized bed. Furthermore, the proposed dimensionless parameter vp reflects the effect of particle flow characteristics, particle fluidization degree, and pulsation frequency on immersed-tube erosion during pulsating flow.CO 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
In this study, the effects of the type of pulsating inlet waveform, pulsation frequency, and pulsation amplitude on the stability of fluidized beds and the erosion of immersed tubes were investigated by numerical simulation. Compared with rectangular and triangular inlet flows, sinusoidal flow induced the lowest immersed-tube erosion rate and pressure-drop fluctuation in the fluidized bed. Furthermore, under sinusoidal flow with a pulsation frequency of 1 Hz and pulsation amplitude of 0.25um, the immersed-tube erosion rate was lower by 1.8 %, standard deviation of pressure drop by 14.16 %, and energy generated from bubble rupture by 47.83 % than those under uniform flow. A dimen-sionless parameter vp that can represent immersed-tube erosion during pulsating flow was proposed, which reflects the effect of particle flow characteristics, particle fluidization degree, and pulsation fre-quency on immersed-tube erosion.CO 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available