4.6 Article

Insights from an exergy analysis of a green chemistry chitosan biorefinery

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages 666-677

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2023.04.038

Keywords

Exergy analysis; Process simulation; Chitosan biorefinery; Green chemistry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chitosan production from shrimp exoskeletons usually involves toxic chemical solvents and high energy consumption. This study proposes a greener route that reduces chemical solvents and freshwater consumption, achieving a global energy efficiency of 75%. Process simulation and exergy analysis identify critical stages with high irreversibility and reveal sources of energy inefficiencies.
Chitosan is a biopolymer with a wide range of applications; however, its production from chitin involves using toxic chemical solvents and high energy consumption. In this study, we propose a new greener route for producing chitosan from shrimp exoskeletons. Our design reduces chemical solvents and freshwater consumption while adhering to Green Chemistry principles. Through process simulation and exergy analysis, we identified critical stages with high irreversibility and achieved a global energy efficiency of 75%, outperforming the conventional chitosan extraction process. An exergy analysis is then conducted to identify sources of energy inefficiencies and reveal process irreversibilities. With a proces-sing capacity of 6507 kg/h of shrimp shells, our proposed biorefinery produces valuable by-products such as astaxanthin and minerals/proteins. The exergy analysis determined drying, dilution, and washing units as critical stages with the highest irreversibility. Our results demonstrate the potential of applying Green Chemistry principles to improve the sustainability of chitosan production from aquaculture waste streams. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available