4.3 Article

Rapid pressure-decay technique for determining the O-2 and CO2 permeability coefficients of polymeric films considering the gas compressibility effect

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 210, Issue 12, Pages 2261-2268

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00986445.2023.2189108

Keywords

Barrier properties; gas compressibility; gas permeation; permeability; polymeric films; pressure-decay

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a simplified pressure-decay method for evaluating the permeability of polymeric films. The method eliminates the need for both vacuum and pressure operations and includes gas compressibility in the calculations. The equipment is inexpensive and provides more realistic equations for calculating the permeability coefficients compared to the standard method. Validation tests with commercial films showed close agreement with literature values, and significant errors were observed when gas compressibility was ignored.
This study describes a pressure-decay method for rapid assessment of the permeability of polymeric films. The equipment is a simplified version of that proposed by ISO 15105-1 2007 without the need of both vacuum and pressure operations. The gas compressibility effect was included in the calculations to represent the actual driving force for permeation. Darcy's law was fitted to pressure loss data to yield the permeability coefficients. The equipment is inexpensive, and the equations for calculating the gas permeability coefficient are more realistic than those proposed by the standard. Validation tests were performed with commercial films using O-2 and CO2. The polyethylene film had average permeability coefficients of P-O2 = 1.89 x 10(-17) m(3).m.m(-2).s(-1).Pa-1 and P-CO2 = 10.58 x 10(-17) m(3).m.m(-2).s(-1).Pa-1. The permeability for a commercial polyester film was P-O2 = 1.54 x 10(-19) m(3).m.m(-2).s(-1).Pa-1. Values closely matched those reported in the literature. Errors ranging from 43 to 79% were observed when the gas compressibility was ignored.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available