4.4 Article

Fluid Flow Modeling and Analysis of Low- and High-Gravity Spiral Concentrators: Experimental and Analytical Approaches

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 8, Pages 1619-1629

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.202200508

Keywords

Fluid depth; Free surface velocity; High-gravity spiral concentrator; High-speed imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An experimental evaluation of flow field on two high-gravity spiral concentrators is conducted, and the analytical solutions are presented. Liquid level on the spiral troughs is measured using a digital depth gauge. Tracer particle trajectories and free surface velocity of the spiral are determined through a high-speed camera. Increase in flow rate leads to higher liquid depth and free surface velocity along the trough surface.High-gravity spirals exhibit lower flow depths and free surface velocities, but steeper depths on outer trough zone compared to low-gravity spirals. Higher flow depths contribute to larger circulation zones, facilitating better separation of heavier minerals from gangue particles.
An experimental evaluation of the flow field on two high-gravity spiral concentrators is presented along with the analytical solutions. A digital depth gauge was used to measure the liquid level on the spiral troughs. The tracer particle trajectories and the free surface velocity of a spiral were determined with a high-speed camera. An increase in the flow rate leads to an increase in the liquid depth and free surface velocity along the trough surface. Three full turns of the high gravity spiral concentrator are sufficient for achieving a stabilized flow. High-gravity spirals show lower flow depths and free surface velocities but steeper depths on the outer trough zone than low-gravity spirals. Higher flow depths contribute to larger circulation zones, which eventually help in greater separation of heavier minerals from gangue particles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available