The coevolution of the spread of a disease and competing opinions in multiplex networks

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a proliferation of conflicting opinions on physical distancing across various media platforms, which has had a significant impact on human behavior and the transmission dynamics of the disease. Inspired by this social phenomenon, we present a novel UAP-SIS model to study the interaction between conflicting opinions and epidemic spreading in multiplex networks, in which individual behavior is based on diverse opinions. We distinguish susceptibility and infectivity among individuals who are unaware, pro-physical distancing and anti-physical distancing, and we incorporate three kinds of mechanisms for generating individual awareness. The coupled dynamics are analyzed in terms of a microscopic Markov chain approach that encompasses the aforementioned elements. With this model, we derive the epidemic threshold which is related to the diffusion of competing opinions and their coupling configuration. Our findings demonstrate that the transmission of the disease is shaped in a significant manner by conflicting opinions, due to the complex interaction between such opinions and the disease itself. Furthermore, the implementation of awareness-generating mechanisms can help to mitigate the overall prevalence of the epidemic, and global awareness and self-awareness can be interchangeable in certain instances. To effectively curb the spread of epidemics, policymakers should take steps to regulate social media and promote physical distancing as the mainstream opinion.

Automated summary

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to conflicting opinions on physical distancing in social media, which has influenced human behavior and the disease transmission dynamics significantly. Using a UAP-SIS model, this study explored the interaction between conflicting opinions and epidemic spreading in multiplex networks, where individual behavior is based on diverse opinions. The model differentiated susceptibility and infectivity among unaware, pro-physical distancing, and anti-physical distancing individuals, incorporating three mechanisms for generating individual awareness. The findings revealed that the transmission of the disease is shaped by conflicting opinions, and awareness-generating mechanisms can help reduce the epidemic's prevalence.