4.7 Review

Thermal energy storage in concrete: Review, testing, and simulation of thermal properties at relevant ranges of elevated temperature

Journal

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
Volume 166, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2023.107096

Keywords

Concrete; Thermal energy storage; Thermal conductivity; Specific heat; High temperature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the thermal performance of concrete for thermal energy storage (TES) applications. The influence of concrete constituents on thermal conductivity and specific heat is summarized based on literature and experimentation. It is found that concrete with siliceous aggregate, low water/cement ratios, and steel fibers exhibit better overall thermal properties. Numerical simulations are conducted to evaluate the impact of concrete thermal property variability on TES capabilities.
This study examines the thermal performance of concrete used for thermal energy storage (TES) applications. The influence of concrete constituents (aggregates, cementitious materials, and fibers) on the thermal conduc-tivity and specific heat are summarized based on literature and via experimentation at elevated temperatures. It is indicated that concrete with siliceous aggregate, low water/cement ratios, and steel fibers produces better overall thermal properties. The results of literature review and laboratory testing are used for numerical simu-lation to evaluate the impact of concrete thermal property variability on TES capabilities. The TES module consists of the heat exchanger and surrounding concrete as the storage media. Both idealized cases without heat loss and realistic cases with insulation and heat losses are considered. The result shows that conventional con-crete mixes can be tailored to decrease the module charge/discharge durations and increase the amount of thermal energy storage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available