4.2 Article

OPTIMIZATION OF BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION FROM CORN COBS BY SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND FERMENTATION USING RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY

Journal

CELLULOSE CHEMISTRY AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 3-4, Pages 359-368

Publisher

EDITURA ACAD ROMANE
DOI: 10.35812/CelluloseChemTechnol.2023.57.31

Keywords

corn cobs; pretreatment; cellulase; simultaneous saccharification and fermentation; bioethanol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study optimized the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process for bioethanol production from corn cobs. It characterized ten different corn genotypes in terms of chemical composition and found that corn genotype PMH10 had high cellulose and low lignin content. Sodium hydroxide pretreatment increased cellulose content and decreased hemicelluloses, lignin, and ash content in the treated cob residues. The optimization of SSF process showed that maximum ethanol concentration could be achieved under certain conditions.
The present study was carried out to optimise the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process for bioethanol production from corn cobs. Ten (10) different corn genotypes (hybrids) were characterized in terms of chemical composition, including total solid, moisture, cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin and ash contents. Among different corn genotypes, milled cobs of corn genotype PMH10 were found to have significantly high cellulose (34.05%) and low lignin content (11.87%). With sodium hydroxide pretreatment, the relative proportion of cellulose (56.70%) increased, while that of hemicelluloses, lignin and ash substantially decreased (11.87, 8.61 and 0.6%) in the treated cob residues. The optimization of the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) process of pretreated cob residues through response surface methodology showed that maximum ethanol concentration of 3.64 mg/mL could be achieved when SSF was performed at 28.58 FPU/g enzyme dosage, solid loading of 14.95% and yeast inoculum of 9.56%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available