4.7 Article

Improved boundary lubrication of perfluoropolyether using fluoropolymer-grafted cellulose nanocrystal

Journal

CELLULOSE
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages 3757-3771

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-023-05120-z

Keywords

Cellulose nanocrystals; Perfluoropolyether lubricant; Polytetrafluoroethylene powder; Boundary lubrication

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study aims to explore alternative nanoparticles with higher mechanical strength to replace polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) powder as a thickener for fluorine greases. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) were surface modified by grafting fluoropolymer chains and introduced into perfluoropolyether PFPE base oil. The results showed that the obtained polyhexafuorobutyl methacrylate grafted CNC (CNC-g-PHFMA) powder exhibited better friction reduction (11%) and wear resistance (19%) compared to PTFE, indicating a good application prospect for fluoropolymer-grafted CNCs in fluorine greases.
As the thickener for fluorine greases, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) powder performs insufficient load-carrying capacity and limited assistance for friction reduction and wear resistance in the boundary lubrication regime. The present work aims to explore novel nanoparticles with higher mechanical strength as an alternative to PTFE. Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) were surface modified by grafting (or partially adsorbing) fluoropolymer chains and introduced into perfluoropolyether PFPE base oil. The obtained polyhexafuorobutyl methacrylate grafted CNC (CNC-g-PHFMA) powder exhibited good compatibility with the PFPE oil. The friction test and wear analysis showed that CNC-g-PHFMA formed a more intensive and stable tribo-film than PTFE on the sliding surface, resulting in more effective friction reduction (11%) and wear resistance (19%). This study demonstrates that fluoropolymer-grafted CNCs have a good application prospect in fluorine greases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available