4.6 Article

Impact of NOTCH1 polymorphisms on liver cancer in a Chinese Han population

Journal

CELL CYCLE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2023.2189766

Keywords

Liver cancer; NOTCH1 polymorphisms; stratification analysis; multifactor dimensionality reduction

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The up-expression of NOTCH1 gene is associated with advanced liver cancer and is linked to tumor size, stage, metastasis, and invasion. This study aimed to assess the relationship between NOTCH1 genetic variants and liver cancer risk. The findings suggest that rs10521-G, rs2229971-A, and rs4489420-A may serve as protective factors against liver cancer susceptibility in the Chinese Han population.
NOTCH1, a member of the Notch family, is up-expression in advanced liver cancer (LC) patients and is associated with tumor sizes, tumor stage, metastasis, and invasion. A few studies have discovered the contribution of NOTCH1 variants to LC risk. Our purpose was to assess the relationship of NOTCH1 rs10521, rs2229971, and rs4489420 to LC risk. We enrolled 709 LC patients and 708 healthy controls. Genotyping was determined through the Agena MassARRAY system. Multiple genetic models by logistic regression were useful for odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Rs10521-G (p = 0.009, OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61-0.93), rs2229971-A (p = 0.023, OR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.67-0.97), and rs4489420-A (p = 0.014, OR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.16-0.85) might be protective factors for LC occurrence in the Chinese Han population, especially rs10521 and rs2229971 (false-positive report probability (FPRP) 90%). Interestingly, stratified analysis displayed that the contribution of NOTCH1 polymorphisms to LC risk might be associated with gender, age, smoking, and drinking. Our data first determined that NOTCH1 rs10521-G, rs2229971-A, and rs4489420-A might be protective factors for LC susceptibility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available