4.7 Article

Drug combinations identified by high-throughput screening promote cell cycle transition and upregulate Smad pathways in myeloma

Journal

CANCER LETTERS
Volume 568, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216284

Keywords

Myeloma; MYC; p16; Dinaciclib; Entinostat

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drug resistance and disease progression are common in MM patients. A study identified 43 potentially synergistic combinations through drug screening and in silico analysis. These combinations effectively reduce MYC expression and enhance p16 activity, leading to improved viability and prolonged survival in MM models.
Drug resistance and disease progression are common in multiple myeloma (MM) patients, underscoring the need for new therapeutic combinations. A high-throughput drug screen in 47 MM cell lines and in silico Huber robust regression analysis of drug responses revealed 43 potentially synergistic combinations. We hypothesized that effective combinations would reduce MYC expression and enhance p16 activity. Six combinations cooperatively reduced MYC protein, frequently over-expressed in MM and also cooperatively increased p16 expression, frequently downregulated in MM. Synergistic reductions in viability were observed with top combinations in proteasome inhibitor-resistant and sensitive MM cell lines, while sparing fibroblasts. Three combinations significantly prolonged survival in a transplantable Ras-driven allograft model of advanced MM closely recapitulating high-risk/refractory myeloma in humans and reduced viability of ex vivo treated patient cells. Common genetic pathways similarly downregulated by these combinations promoted cell cycle transition, whereas pathways most upregulated were involved in TGF & beta;/SMAD signaling. These preclinical data identify potentially useful drug combinations for evaluation in drug-resistant MM and reveal potential mechanisms of combined drug sensitivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available