Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program

PurposeTo assess preferences for design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program (PharmFIT (TM)) among screening-eligible adults in the United States (US) and explore the impact of rurality on pharmacy use patterns (e.g., pharmacy type, prescription pick-up preference, service quality rating).MethodsWe conducted a national online survey of non-institutionalized US adults through panels managed by Qualtrics, a survey research company. A total of 1,045 adults (response rate 62%) completed the survey between March and April 2021. Sampling quotas matched respondents to the 2010 US Census and oversampled rural residents. We assessed pharmacy use patterns by rurality and design preferences for learning about PharmFIT (TM); receiving a FIT kit from a pharmacy; and completing and returning the FIT kit.ResultsPharmacy use patterns varied, with some notable differences across rurality. Rural respondents used local, independently owned pharmacies more than non-rural respondents (20.4%, 6.3%, p < 0.001) and rated pharmacy service quality higher than non-rural respondents. Non-rural respondents preferred digital communication to learn about PharmFIT (TM) (36% vs 47%; p < 0.001) as well as digital FIT counseling (41% vs 49%; p = 0.02) more frequently than rural participants. Preferences for receiving and returning FITs were associated with pharmacy use patterns: respondents who pick up prescriptions in-person preferred to get their FIT (OR 7.7; 5.3-11.2) and return it in-person at the pharmacy (OR 1.7; 1.1-2.4).ConclusionPharmacies are highly accessible and could be useful for expanding access to CRC screening services. Local context and pharmacy use patterns should be considered in the design and implementation of PharmFIT (TM).

Automated summary

This study examined preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program (PharmFIT(TM)) among screening-eligible adults in the US and explored the impact of rurality on pharmacy use patterns. Results showed that pharmacy use patterns varied across rurality, with rural residents using local independently owned pharmacies more frequently and rating pharmacy service quality higher compared to non-rural residents. Non-rural residents preferred digital communication and counseling for PharmFIT(TM) more frequently than rural participants. Preferences for receiving and returning FITs were associated with pharmacy use patterns.