4.7 Review

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 68, Issue 11, Pages 1233-1246

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.089

Keywords

clinical decision making; coronary artery bypass; coronary disease; percutaneous coronary intervention; revascularization; stents

Funding

  1. CardioVascular Research Foundation, Seoul, Korea [2015-09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease is the highest-risk lesion subset of ischemic heart disease, and has traditionally been an indication for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Recent evidence suggests comparable clinical outcomes between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and CABG for LMCA disease, with similar rates of mortality and serious composite outcomes, a higher rate of stroke with CABG, and a higher rate of repeat revascularization with PCI. These results have been translated to the current guideline recommendation that PCI is a reasonable alternative to CABG in patients with low to intermediate anatomic complexity. However, how the characteristics, treatment, and clinical outcomes of patients with unprotected LMCA disease have evolved over time has not yet been fully evaluated. We therefore described secular trends in the characteristics and long-term outcomes of unprotected LMCA disease using real-world clinical experience from the IRIS-MAIN (Interventional Research Incorporation Society-Left MAIN Revascularization) registry together with a broad review of this topic. (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available