4.2 Article

An eye gaze-aided virtual tape measure for smart construction

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjce-2023-0056

Keywords

virtual tape measures; eye tracking; dimension measurement; hands-free manner; smart construction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a novel eye gaze-aided virtual tape measure framework that enables hands-free measurements in construction. The framework includes three components: data collection for point of interest, sensor calibration, and distance calculation. The effectiveness of the framework is tested by measuring the dimensions of 15 common objects in laboratory and on-site environments, achieving an average absolute error of 2.4 cm and a relative error of 4.8%. A comparison study demonstrates its superior performance over iPhone's Measure application.
In construction, the accurate measurements are important in ensuring the quality of work delivered. Different measuring tools have been developed to help workers conduct accurate measuring. However, they maybe subject to manipulation difficulties, such as the need for tap/gesture interaction. This paper proposes a novel eye gaze-aided virtual tape measure framework that provides a hands-free manner for conducting the measurements in construction. This framework consists of three components: data collection for point of interest, sensor calibration, and distance calculation. Its effectiveness is tested by measuring the dimensions of 15 common objects in laboratory and on-site environments and achieves the average absolute and relative errors of 2.4 cm and 4.8%. The absolute errors range from 0.3 to 7.3 cm. A comparison study is conducted to demonstrate its superior performance over iPhone's Measure application. The results illustrate the feasibility and potential of using the framework to enable measures for smart construction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available