4.7 Article

Pulse Pressure and Risk for Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Atherothrombosis From the REACH Registry

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages 392-403

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.084

Keywords

blood pressure; diastolic blood pressure; hypertension; systolic blood pressure; wave reflections

Funding

  1. Sanofi
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  3. Waksman Foundation (Tokyo, Japan)
  4. Servier
  5. Ablynx
  6. Amarin
  7. Amgen
  8. Astellas
  9. AstraZeneca
  10. Bayer
  11. Boehringer Ingelheim
  12. Daiichi-Sankyo
  13. Eisai
  14. GlaxoSmithKline
  15. Eli Lilly
  16. Medtronic
  17. Merck Sharp Dohme
  18. Novartis
  19. Otsuka
  20. Pfizer
  21. Roche
  22. Medicines Company
  23. Bouchara Recordati
  24. Daichii-Sankyo
  25. Ipsen
  26. Menarini
  27. Merck Serono
  28. Merck Sharpe Dohme
  29. Pileje
  30. Takeda
  31. Ethicon
  32. Forest Laboratories
  33. Ischemix

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND Pulse pressure (PP) provides valuable prognostic information in specific populations, but few studies have assessed its value on cardiovascular outcomes in a broad, worldwide population. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to determine whether PP is associated with major adverse cardiovascular outcomes, independently of mean arterial pressure. METHODS Participants from the international REACH (Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health) registry, which evaluates subjects with clinical atherothrombotic disease or risk factors for its development, were examined. Those with incomplete 4-year follow-up or PP data (final n = 45,087) were excluded. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the association between PP and cardiovascular outcomes, including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, all myocardial infarction, all stroke, cardiovascular hospitalization, and a combined outcome. PP was analyzed as a continuous and categorical (i.e., by quartile) variable. RESULTS The mean age of the cohort was 68 +/- 10 years, 35% were women, and 81% were treated for hypertension. The mean blood pressure was 138 +/- 19/79 +/- 11 mm Hg, rendering a mean PP of 49 +/- 16 mm Hg. On univariate analysis, increasing PP quartile was associated with worse outcomes (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). After adjusting for sex, age, current smoking status, history of hypercholesterolemia, history of diabetes, aspirin use, statin use, blood pressure medication use, and mean arterial pressure, PP quartile was still associated with all outcomes except all stroke and cardiovascular death (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Analysis of PP as a continuous variable yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS In an international cohort of high-risk subjects, PP, a readily available hemodynamic parameter, is associated with multiple adverse cardiovascular outcomes and provides prognostic utility beyond that of mean arterial pressure. (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available