4.6 Review

Beyond acute concussion assessment to office management: a systematic review informing the development of a Sport Concussion Office Assessment Tool (SCOAT6) for adults and children

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 57, Issue 11, Pages 737-+

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106897

Keywords

Athletes; Consensus; Adolescent; Head

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically reviewed the assessment of sport-related concussion (SRC) in the subacute phase (3-30 days) and provided recommendations for developing a Sport Concussion Office Assessment Tool (SCOAT6). The data sources included various databases and the quality of the studies was assessed. The findings informed the development of SCOAT6, which includes the assessment of autonomic function, dual gait, vestibular ocular motor screening (VOMS), and mental health screening. Rating: 8/10
ObjectivesTo systematically review the scientific literature regarding the assessment of sport-related concussion (SRC) in the subacute phase (3-30 days) and provide recommendations for developing a Sport Concussion Office Assessment Tool (SCOAT6). Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science searched from 2001 to 2022. Data extracted included study design, population, definition of SRC diagnosis, outcome measure(s) and results. Eligibility criteria(1) Original research, cohort studies, case-control studies, diagnostic accuracy and case series with samples >10; (2) SRC; (3) screening/technology that assessed SRC in the subacute period and (4) low risk of bias (ROB). ROB was performed using adapted Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy classification. ResultsOf 9913 studies screened, 127 met inclusion, assessing 12 overlapping domains. Results were summarised narratively. Studies of acceptable (81) or high (2) quality were used to inform the SCOAT6, finding sufficient evidence for including the assessment of autonomic function, dual gait, vestibular ocular motor screening (VOMS) and mental health screening. ConclusionCurrent SRC tools have limited utility beyond 72 hours. Incorporation of a multimodal clinical assessment in the subacute phase of SRC may include symptom evaluation, orthostatic hypotension screen, verbal neurocognitive tests, cervical spine evaluation, neurological screen, Modified Balance Error Scoring System, single/dual task tandem gait, modified VOMS and provocative exercise tests. Screens for sleep disturbance, anxiety and depression are recommended. Studies to evaluate the psychometric properties, clinical feasibility in different environments and time frames are needed. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020154787.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available