4.6 Article

Clinical impact of reducing the frequency of clozapine monitoring: controlled mirror-image cohort study

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 223, Issue 2, Pages 382-388

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2023.44

Keywords

Clozapine; COVID-19; agranulocytosis; neutropenia; pharmacovigilance

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To minimize infection during COVID-19, the clozapine hematalogical monitoring interval was extended. This study aims to investigate the impact of this temporary policy change on clinical and safety outcomes.
BackgroundTo minimise infection during COVID-19, the clozapine haematological monitoring interval was extended from 4-weekly to 12-weekly intervals in South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. AimsTo investigate the impact of this temporary policy change on clinical and safety outcomes. MethodAll patients who received clozapine treatment with extended (12-weekly) monitoring in a large London National Health Service trust were included in a 1-year mirror-image study. A comparison group was selected with standard monitoring. The proportion of participants with mild to severe neutropenia and the proportion of participants attending the emergency department for clozapine-induced severe neutropenia treatment during the follow-up period were compared. Psychiatric hospital admission rates, clozapine dose and concomitant psychotropic medication in the 1 year before and the 1 year after extended monitoring were compared. All-cause clozapine discontinuation at 1-year follow-up was examined. ResultsOf 569 participants, 459 received clozapine with extended monitoring and 110 controls continued as normal. The total person-years were 458 in the intervention group and 109 in the control group, with a median follow-up time of 1 year in both groups. During follow-up, two participants (0.4%) recorded mild to moderate neutropenia in the intervention group and one (0.9%) in the control group. There was no difference in the incidence of haematological events between the two groups (IRR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.02-28.15, P = 0.29). All neutropenia cases in the intervention group were mild, co-occurring during COVID-19 infection. The median number of admissions per patient during the pre-mirror period remained unchanged (0, IQR = 0) during the post-mirror period. There was one death in the control group, secondary to COVID-19 infection. ConclusionsThere was no evidence that the incidence of severe neutropenia was increased in those receiving extended monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available