4.2 Article

Mixed Feedings and Necrotizing Enterocolitis: The Proportion of Human Milk Matters

Journal

BREASTFEEDING MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 469-474

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2022.0268

Keywords

human milk; feeding intolerance; proportion; necrotizing enterocolitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the influence of different proportions of human milk (HM) on the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). The results show that a low ratio of HM significantly increases the risk of NEC in infants with very low birth weight (VLBW).
Objectives: Impact of the proportion of human milk (HM) in mixed feeding on necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains unknown. This study explores the influence of different proportions of HM on the risk of NEC.Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed in infants with very low birth weight (VLBW). A spline smoothing curve was used to evaluate the dose-dependent association between HM and the risk of NEC. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to detect the association between the proportion of HM and NEC.Results: Twenty-four infants developed NEC, with 4 (1.9%) in the high HM group, 18 (28.1%) in the low HM group, and 2 (8.0%) in the exclusive formula group (p < 0.001). After adjusting for the relevant confounders, low HM (proportion of HM <= 54%) (OR 33.526, 95% confidential interval [CI] 7.183-156.475, p < 0.001) and exclusive formula feeding (OR 8.493, 95% CI 1.107-65.187, p = 0.040) significantly increased the incidence of NEC, compared with the high HM feeding (proportion of HM >54%). Similarly, low HM was independently associated with an increased risk of feeding intolerance compared with high HM feeding (OR 4.383, 95% CI 2.243-8.564, p < 0.001).Conclusion: A low ratio of HM (<= 54%) significantly increased the risk of intestinal complications in VLBW infants. Mixed feeding should relate to the proportion of HM in premature infants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available