4.5 Editorial Material

Positive surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in-situ: does histologic grade or estrogen receptor status matter?

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06905-3

Keywords

Ductal carcinoma in situ; Breast conserving surgery; Positive margins; Reoperation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the factors associated with positive surgical margins in patients with DCIS following BCS, focusing on histologic grade and ER status. The results showed that tumor size and ER negativity were significantly associated with positive margins, suggesting that modifying the surgical approach could reduce the risk of positive margins in patients with large-sized ER negative DCIS.
Purpose DCIS has been shown to have a higher rate of positive margins following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) than invasive breast cancer. We aim to analyze certain factors of DCIS, specifically histologic grade and estrogen receptor (ER) status, in patients with positive surgical margins following BCS to determine if there is an association. Methods A retrospective review of our institutional patient registry was performed to identify women with DCIS and microinvasive DCIS who underwent BCS by a single surgeon from 1999 to 2021. Demographics and clinicopathologic characteristics between patients with and without positive surgical margins were compared using chi-square or Student ' s t-test. We assessed factors associated with positive margins using univariate and multivariable logistic regression. Results Of the 615 patients evaluated, there was no significant difference in demographics between the patients with and without positive surgical margins. Increasing tumor size was an independent risk factor for margin positivity (P = < 0.001). On univariate analysis both high histologic grade (P = 0.009) and negative ER status (P = < 0.001) were significantly associated with positive surgical margins. However, when adjusted in multivariable analysis, only negative ER status remained significantly associated with margin positivity (OR = 0.39 [95% CI 0.20-0.77]; P = 0.006). Conclusion The study confirms increased tumor size as a risk factor for positive surgical margins. We also demonstrated that ER negative DCIS was independently associated with a higher rate of positive margins after BCS. Given this information, we can modify our surgical approach to reduce rate of positive margins in patients with large-sized ER negative DCIS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available