4.6 Article

Eating speed and abdominal adiposity in middle-aged adults: a cross-sectional study in Vietnam

Journal

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15328-0

Keywords

Abdominal adiposity; Waist circumference; Waist-to-height ratio; Eating speed; Vietnam

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the association between eating speed and abdominal obesity in a Vietnamese population. The results showed that a faster eating speed was associated with a higher prevalence of abdominal obesity.
BackgroundSeveral studies have associated fast eating speed with the risk of general obesity, but there are inadequate data on the association between eating speed and abdominal adiposity which may pose a higher threat to health than general obesity. The present study aimed to investigate the association between eating speed and abdominal obesity in a Vietnamese population.MethodsBetween June 2019 and June 2020, the baseline survey of an ongoing prospective cohort study on the determinants of cardiovascular disease in Vietnamese adults was conducted. A total of 3,000 people aged 40-60 years old (1,160 men and 1,840 women) were recruited from eight communes in the rural district of Cam Lam, Khanh Hoa province, in Central Vietnam. Self-reported eating speed was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale, and responses were collapsed into the following three categories: slow, normal, and fast. Abdominal obesity was defined as a waist-to-height ratio of >= 0.5. Poisson regression with a robust variance estimator was used to assess the association between eating speed and abdominal obesity.ResultsCompared with slow eating speed, the adjusted prevalence ratio (95% confidence interval) for abdominal obesity was 1.14 (1.05, 1.25)1.14 (1.05, 1.25) for normal eating speed and 1.30 (1.19, 1.41) for fast eating speed (P for trend < 0.001).ConclusionA faster eating speed was associated with a higher prevalence of abdominal obesity in a middle-aged population in rural Vietnam.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available