4.6 Article

Prevalence and correlation of multiple chemical sensitivity and electromagnetic hypersensitivity with age, sex, and depression in the Japanese population: a retrospective study

Journal

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16152-2

Keywords

Multiple chemical sensitivity; Electromagnetic hypersensitivity; Depression; Sex-based differences; Japanese population

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the prevalence and correlation of multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) and electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) in the Japanese population, with a focus on age, sex, and depression. The results showed that older women were more likely to exhibit MCS and EHS symptoms, and depression was correlated with MCS and EHS. Therefore, although MCS and EHS are strongly correlated, they exhibit distinct characteristics and symptoms, indicating that they can be regarded as separate conditions.
BackgroundIn Japan, there are currently no definitive conclusions regarding the characteristics of multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) and electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS). This study aimed to determine the prevalence and correlation of MCS and EHS with age, sex, and depression in the Japanese population.MethodsAn anonymous self-report questionnaire was distributed to 2,007 participants. Variables such as MCS, EHS, depression score, and demographic characteristics were individually evaluated using the U-test, chi-squared test, and correlation analyses. Moreover, we performed a covariance structure analysis to build a structural equation model.ResultsOlder individuals and women were more likely to exhibit MCS and EHS symptoms. Moreover, depression was correlated with MCS and EHS.ConclusionsAlthough MCS and EHS are strongly correlated, they exhibit distinct characteristics and symptoms, indicating that they can be regarded as separate conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available