4.5 Article

Diabetes mellitus is a potential risk factor for aseptic loosening around hip and knee arthroplasty

Journal

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06376-z

Keywords

Aseptic loosening; Diabetes mellitus; Arthroplasty; Osteolysis; Inflammation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diabetes mellitus is associated with aseptic loosening around hip and knee arthroplasty, as patients with diabetes mellitus are more prone to develop chronic inflammation around the prosthesis, increasing the risk of aseptic loosening.
BackgroundAseptic loosening is a leading cause of revision following total hip and knee arthroplasty which is caused by chronic inflammation around the prosthesis. Diabetes mellitus causes systemic inflammatory changes which could increase the risk of aseptic loosening. This study investigated the association between diabetes mellitus and aseptic loosening around hip and knee arthroplasty.MethodsA case-control study was conducted at a single arthroplasty centre over the seven-year period of January 2015 to December 2021. Cases were defined as any adult patient undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty for aseptic loosening. Controls were randomly selected patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty during the same period at a 1:4 ratio. Risk factors were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 440 patients were included in our study - 88 in the aseptic loosening group and 352 patients in the control group. The odds of having diabetes mellitus in the aseptic loosening group was 2.78 (95%CI 1.31-5.92, P = 0.01). Other risk factors were not significantly different between the two groups.ConclusionsThe incidence of diabetes mellitus is significantly greater in patients undergoing revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening. Further research is required to explore whether this association is indeed causative.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available