4.5 Article

Can we determine anterior hip coverage from pelvic anteroposterior radiographs? A study of patients with hip dysplasia

Journal

BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06624-2

Keywords

Hip dysplasia; Anterior coverage; Periacetabular osteotomy; Pelvic anteroposterior radiographs; False profile radiograph

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insufficient coverage of the hip joint can lead to instability and pain. This study investigates the correlation between four parameters on pelvic radiographs and the anterior center edge angle on false profile radiographs. The results show inconsistent correlation between these parameters on pelvic radiographs and the anterior center edge angle on false profile radiographs. Therefore, it is recommended to routinely use false profile radiographs for evaluating anterior hip coverage.
PurposeInsufficient coverage causes hip joint instability and results in hip pain. Anterior hip coverage can be determined on both pelvic anteroposterior (AP) radiographs and false profile (FP) radiographs. Four parameters are commonly used to determine the anterior coverage on pelvic AP radiographs: the crossover index, crossover sign, anterior wall index (AWI), and rule of thirds. This study aims to clarify the relationship between these 4 parameters on AP radiographs and the anterior center edge angle (ACEA) on FP radiographs.MethodsIn this study, 53 patients who underwent periacetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia at our center between July 2020 and October 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Four parameters on AP radiographs and the ACEA on FP radiographs before surgery and 6 months after surgery were measured and compared for each hip.ResultsUpon examining the 53 hips in this study, there was no correlation between either the crossover index and the ACEA (P = 0.66) or the crossover sign before surgery. The postoperative correlation between the crossover index and the ACEA was weak (r = 0.36, P = 0.007), and that between the crossover sign and the ACEA was moderate (r = 0.41, P = 0.003). There was a weak correlation between the AWI and ACEA both before (r = 0.288, P = 0.036) and after (r = 0.349, P = 0.011) the operation. Evaluation of the anterior coverage by the rule of thirds was also not consistent when determining the anterior coverage with the ACEA.ConclusionAnterior coverage on AP radiographs is largely inconsistent with ACEA on FP radiographs, especially before the surgery. It is recommended to take FP radiographs routinely for determining anterior hip coverage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available