4.4 Article

'Guidance should have been there 15 years ago' research stakeholders' perspectives on ancillary care in the global south: a case study of Malawi

Journal

BMC MEDICAL ETHICS
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00889-x

Keywords

Ancillary care; Ethics; Obligation; Consideration; Resource-constrained settings; Southern Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the perceptions and experiences of research stakeholders regarding ancillary care in biomedical research projects in Malawi. Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with researchers, health officials, research ethics committee members, research participants, and grants officers from international research funding organizations. The findings show that all stakeholders recognize the potential health benefits of providing ancillary care in biomedical research but also express concerns about the lack of guidance and support.
BackgroundMedical researchers in resource-constrained settings must make difficult moral decisions about the provision of ancillary care to participants where additional healthcare needs fall outside the scope of the research and are not provided for by the local healthcare system. We examined research stakeholder perceptions and experiences of ancillary care in biomedical research projects in Malawi.MethodsWe conducted 45 qualitative in-depth interviews with key research stakeholders: researchers, health officials, research ethics committee members, research participants and grants officers from international research funding organisations. Thematic analysis was used to analyse and interpret the findings.FindingsAll stakeholders perceived the provision of ancillary care to have potential health benefits to study participants in biomedical research. However, they also had concerns, particularly related to the absence of guidance to support it. Some suggested that consideration for ancillary care provision could be possible on a case-by-case basis but that most of the support from research projects should be directed towards strengthening the public health system, emphasising public good above individual or personal benefits. Some researchers and ethics committee members raised concerns about potential tensions in terms of funding, for example balancing study demands with addressing participants' additional health needs.ConclusionOur findings highlight the complexities and gaps in the guidance around the provision of ancillary care in Malawi and other resource-constrained settings more generally. To promote the provision of ancillary care, we recommend that national and international guidelines for research ethics include specific recommendations for resource-constrained settings and specific types of research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available