4.6 Article

Standardising outcome reporting for clinical trials of interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding: Development of a core outcome set

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17473

Keywords

AUB; core outcome set; heavy menstrual bleeding

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Through a systematic review and qualitative studies, 10 most important outcomes were identified, including subjective blood loss, menstrual cycle metrics, severity of dysmenorrhoea, quality of life, etc. These outcomes are applicable to clinical trials and guideline development, and are of great significance in informing policy-making.
Objective To develop a core outcome set for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB).Design Core outcome set (COS) development methodology described by the COMET initiative.Setting University hospital gynaecology department, online international survey and web-based international consensus meetings.Population or sample An international collaboration of stakeholders (clinicians, patients, academics, guideline developers) from 20 countries and 6 continents.Methods Phase 1: Systematic review of previously reported outcomes to identify potential core outcomes. Phase 2: Qualitative studies with patients to identify outcomes most important to them. Phase 3: Online two-round Delphi survey to achieve consensus about which outcomes are most important. Phase 4: A consensus meeting to finalise the COS.Main outcome measuresOutcome importance was assessed in the Delphi survey on a 9-point scale.Results From the 'long list' of 114, 10 outcomes were included in the final COS: subjective blood loss; flooding; menstrual cycle metrics; severity of dysmenorrhoea; number of days with dysmenorrhoea; quality of life; adverse events; patient satisfaction; number of patients going on to have further treatment for HMB and haemoglobin level.Conclusions The final COS includes variables that are feasible for use in clinical trials in all resource settings and apply to all known underlying causes of the symptom of HMB. These outcomes should be reported in all future trials of interventions, their systematic reviews, and clinical guidelines to underpin policy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available