4.5 Article

False discovery rate-controlled multiple testing for union null hypotheses: a knockoff-based approach

Journal

BIOMETRICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/biom.13848

Keywords

FDR control; heterogeneity; replicability; reproducibility; variable selection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

False discovery rate (FDR) controlling procedures ensure statistical guarantees for replicability in signal identification based on multiple hypotheses testing. This paper introduces a knockoff-based variable selection method (Simultaneous knockoffs) that provides exact FDR control guarantees under finite sample settings. This method identifies mutual signals from multiple independent datasets by jointly considering information from different sources (with potential heterogeneity).
False discovery rate (FDR) controlling procedures provide important statistical guarantees for replicability in signal identification based on multiple hypotheses testing. In many fields of study, FDR controling procedures are used in high-dimensional (HD) analyses to discover features that are truly associated with the outcome. In some recent applications, data on the same set of candidate features are independently collected in multiple different studies. For example, gene expression data are collected at different facilities and with different cohorts, to identify the genetic biomarkers of multiple types of cancers. These studies provide us with opportunities to identify signals by considering information from different sources (with potential heterogeneity) jointly. This paper is about how to provide FDR control guarantees for the tests of union null hypotheses of conditional independence. We present a knockoff-based variable selection method (Simultaneous knockoffs) to identify mutual signals from multiple independent datasets, providing exact FDR control guarantees under finite sample settings. This method can work with very general model settings and test statistics. We demonstrate the performance of this method with extensive numerical studies and two real-data examples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available