Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Selecting and Ranking Individualized Treatment Rules With Unmeasured Confounding
Bo Zhang et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION (2021)
Optimal Individualized Decision Rules Using Instrumental Variable Methods
Hongxiang Qiu et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION (2021)
Estimating Dynamic Treatment Regimes in Mobile Health Using V-Learning
Daniel J. Luckett et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION (2020)
A Semiparametric Instrumental Variable Approach to Optimal Treatment Regimes Under Endogeneity
Yifan Cui et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION (2020)
A Bayesian Machine Learning Approach for Optimizing Dynamic Treatment Regimes
Thomas A. Murray et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)
Interpretable Dynamic Treatment Regimes
Yichi Zhang et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION (2018)
Constructing dynamic treatment regimes over indefinite time horizons
Ashkan Ertefaie et al.
BIOMETRIKA (2018)
A comparison of Bayesian and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding
Lawrence C. McCandless et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2017)
Doubly-Robust Dynamic Treatment Regimen Estimation Via Weighted Least Squares
Michael P. Wallace et al.
BIOMETRICS (2015)
Tree-based methods for individualized treatment regimes
E. B. Laber et al.
BIOMETRIKA (2015)
Who will benefit from antidepressants in the acute treatment of bipolar depression? A reanalysis of the STEP-BD study by Sachs et al. 2007, using Q-learning
Fan Wu et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIPOLAR DISORDERS (2015)
Dynamic treatment regimes: Technical challenges and applications
Eric B. Laber et al.
ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF STATISTICS (2014)
Inference for Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes Using an Adaptive m-Out-of-n Bootstrap Scheme
Bibhas Chakraborty et al.
BIOMETRICS (2013)
Overweight, Obesity, and Depression A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Longitudinal Studies
Floriana S. Luppino et al.
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY (2010)
When to Start Treatment? A Systematic Approach to the Comparison of Dynamic Regimes Using Observational Data
Lauren E. Cain et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS (2010)
Sensitivity analyses to estimate the potential impact of unmeasured confounding in causal research
Rolf H. H. Groenwold et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
Estimating Optimal Dynamic Regimes: Correcting Bias under the Null
Erica E. M. Moodie et al.
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS (2010)
Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies
Lawrence C. McCandless et al.
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2007)
Instruments for causal inference -: An epidemiologist's dream?
MA Hernán et al.
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies
SA Murphy
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2005)
Multiple-bias modelling for analysis of observational data
S Greenland
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2005)
Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis and Bayesian analysis of smoking as an unmeasured confounder in a study of silica and lung cancer
K Steenland et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2004)
Quantifying and reporting uncertainty from systematic errors
CV Phillips
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2003)
Optimal dynamic treatment regimes
SA Murphy
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY (2003)
The PHQ-9 - Validity of a brief depression severity measure
K Kroenke et al.
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE (2001)
A design for testing clinical strategies: biased adaptive within-subject randomization
PW Lavori et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2000)