4.6 Article

SRT: Improved transformer-based model for classification of 2D heartbeat images

Journal

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL
Volume 88, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2023.105017

Keywords

Deep learning; Transformer; Electrocardiography; Classification; Class activation mapping; t-SNE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a 2D deep learning classification network SRT was proposed to improve automatic ECG analysis. The model structure was enhanced with the CNN and Transformer-encoder modules, and a novel attention module and Dilated Stem structure were introduced to improve feature extraction. Comparative experiments showed that the proposed model outperformed several advanced methods.
Electrocardiography (ECG) is a crucial tool for diagnosing cardiovascular diseases. In particular, combining clinical ECG with computer technology for automatic ECG analysis can improve ECG discrimination accuracy. In this study, to tackle the existing problems of 2D classification models (CNN and Transformer) of ECG heartbeat images, we proposed a 2D deep learning classification network SRT comprising a CNN and Transformer-encoder modules to improve the model structure. Furthermore, to identify the global and local differences between different types of ECG heartbeats, we propose a novel attention module (SC-RGA module) to assist the multi-headed attention mechanism in improving the feature extraction of ECG images and the Dilated Stem structure to expand the receptive field at the input of the network. We also applied a series of strategies to deal with data imbalances in public ECG datasets. Finally, we evaluated the performance of SRT using the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database, with a classification accuracy of 0.957, a sensitivity of 0.881, and an average F1 index of 0.826. Comparative experiments demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms several advanced methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available