4.8 Article

Targeting Warburg effect to rescue the suffocated photodynamic therapy: A cancer-specific solution

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 294, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122017

Keywords

Photodynamic therapy; Tumor; Hypoxia; Glucose metabolism; GSH-Responsive drug release

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the inhibitor of glucose uptake and aerobic glycolysis, Salvianolic acid B, was combined with the photosensitizer chlorin e6 using a redox-responsive micelle. The results showed that Salvianolic acid B suppressed glucose metabolism and delayed oxygen consumption, significantly improving the efficacy of photodynamic therapy both in vitro and in vivo. This study not only offers an alternative strategy to address tumor hypoxia in photodynamic therapy, but also enhances treatment selectivity by targeting the cancer-specific Warburg effect.
The cancer photodynamic therapy (PDT) is limited by a congenital defect, namely the tumor hypoxia. Cancer cells are characterized by the vigorous oxygen-consuming glycolysis, which is well-known as the Warburg effect and one of the primary causes for the hypoxia. Herein, we employed the glucose metabolism as the cancerspecific target to enhance the performance of PDT. The Salvianolic acid B as the inhibitor of glucose uptake and aerobic glycolysis was concomitantly delivered with the photosensitizer chlorin e6 by a redox-responsive organosilica cross-linked micelle. The results demonstrated that the Salvianolic acid B suppressed the glucose metabolism, retarded the oxygen consumption to retain adequate oxygen as the ammo for PDT, which remarkably improve the efficacy of PDT both in vitro and in vivo. Our study not only provides an alternative strategy to address the hypoxia problem for PDT, but also enhances the selectivity of the treatment by targeting the cancer-specific Warburg effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available