4.4 Article

Energetic Diversity in the Electron-Transfer Pathways of Type I Photosynthetic Reaction Centers

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 62, Issue 4, Pages 934-941

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00689

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the crystal structure of HbRC, the redox potential (E-m) values in the electron-transfer branches were calculated by considering the protonation states of all titratable sites. The E-m(A(-1)) for bacteriochlorophyll g in HbRC is lower than E-m(A(-1)) for chlorophyll a in PSI. In contrast, the E-m(F-X) for the Fe4S4 cluster in HbRC is significantly higher than in GsbRC and PSI. It is likely that type I reaction centers have evolved to adapt to their light environments while maintaining electron-transfer cascades.
Photosynthetic reaction centers from heliobacteria (HbRC) and green sulfur bacteria (GsbRC) are homodimeric proteins and share a common ancestor with photosystem I (PSI), classified as type I reaction centers. Using the HbRC crystal structure, we calculated the redox potential (E-m) values in the electron-transfer branches, solving the linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation and considering the protonation states of all titratable sites in the entire protein-pigment complex. E-m(A(-1)) for bacteriochlorophyll g at the secondary site in HbRC (-1157 mV) is as low as E-m(A(-1)) for chlorophyll a in PSI (-1173 mV). E-m(A(0)/HbRC) is at the same level as E-m(A(0)/GsbRC) and is 200 mV higher than E-m(A(0)/PSI) due to the replacement of PsaA-Trp697/PsaB-Trp677 in PSI with PshA-Arg554 in HbRC. In contrast, E-m(F-X) for the Fe4S4 cluster in HbRC (-420 mV) is significantly higher than E-m(F-X) in GsbRC (-719 mV) and PSI (-705 mV) due to the absence of acidic residues that correspond to PscA-Asp634 in GsbRC and PsaB-Asp575 in PSI. It seems likely that type I reaction centers have evolved, adopting (bacterio)chlorophylls suitable for their light environments while maintaining electron-transfer cascades.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available