4.1 Article

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ROOT SYSTEM ARCHITECTURAL TRAITS IN GENOTYPES OF VIGNA RADIATA L. AND VIGNA MUNGO L.

Journal

BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 61-69

Publisher

BANGLADESH BOTANICAL SOC
DOI: 10.3329/bjb.v52i1.65233

Keywords

Root traits; Root diameter intervals; Mungbean; Urdbean

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Investigation of root system architecture (RSA) has great potential to improve crops under suboptimal nutrient and water conditions. This study compared RSA traits among eight genotypes of mungbean and urdbean and found significant variations and medium to high heritability. The genotypes KM 12-29 and PUSA 9072 in mungbean, and LBG 623 and PU 11-14 in urdbean showed higher proportion of RSA traits. The study provides a clear depiction and comparison of RSA traits among mungbean and urdbean genotypes, which can be utilized for cultivar development in future breeding programs.
`Investigation of root system architecture (RSA) has a huge potential to support the crop improvement under suboptimal nutrient and water conditions. The present study was carried out using eight genotypes of each mungbean and urdbean for comparative analysis of RSA traits among the genotypes. Presence of significant variations and medium to high heritability was observed for RSA traits. The genotypes KM 12-29 followed by PUSA 9072 among the mungbean genotypes and LBG 623 followed by PU 11-14 among the urdbean genotypes showed higher proportion of RSA traits. The higher percentage distribution of root traits was observed under diameter intervals in the order of 0-0.5 > 0.5-1.0 > 1.0-1.5 > 1.5-2.0 >> 2.0 mm in both mungbean and urdbean genotypes. Thus, the study shows the clear depiction and comparison of RSA traits among mungbean and urdbean genotypes, which can be exploited for cultivar development in future breeding programmes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available