4.7 Article

Modeling automatic pavement crack object detection and pixel-level segmentation

Journal

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104840

Keywords

Pavement crack detection; Lightweight model; Pixel segmentation; Object detection; Deep learning; Denoising auto -encoder network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a lightweight pavement crack-detection model that combines object detection and semantic segmentation tasks. It utilizes a modified YOLOv4-Tiny model to predict crack bounding boxes and proposes a segmentation threshold. Additionally, an attention feature pyramid network and a denoising autoencoder network are introduced to compensate for accuracy loss and remove background noise. The proposed model achieves equivalent evaluation index values with significantly fewer parameters than conventional models.
Timely pavement crack detection can prevent further pavement deterioration. However, obtaining sufficient quantities of crack information at low cost remains a challenge. This study therefore proposed a lightweight pavement crack-detection model to realize the dual tasks of object detection and semantic segmentation. First, the modified YOLOv4-Tiny model was used to predict the bounding box wrapping cracks, and the threshold for segmentation was proposed. Moreover, an attention feature pyramid network was proposed to compensate for the loss of accuracy owing to the reduction in model parameters and structure scaling. The denoising autoencoder network was provided to remove any background noise that could be recognized as cracks in the segmentation mask. The final number of model parameters was 6.33 M. The performance of the proposed model was compared with that of conventional models, indicating approximately equivalent evaluation index values even though four to five times fewer parameters were included than in the conventional models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available