4.7 Article

Stochastic event-triggered remote state estimation over Gaussian channels without knowing triggering decisions: A Bayesian inference approach

Journal

AUTOMATICA
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2023.110951

Keywords

Event-triggered state estimation; Minimum mean squared error; Noisy channel

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the problem of stochastic event-triggered remote state estimation over a Gaussian communication channel. An approximate minimum mean squared error estimator with adaptive weights is derived based on a commonly-accepted Gaussian assumption. The proposed estimator combines the estimates for both transmission and no transmission cases and has comparable performance to those that know the triggering decisions.
This paper investigates the stochastic event-triggered remote state estimation problem over a Gaus-sian communication channel. The triggering decisions of the sensor determine the transmissions of measurements, and are unknown to the remote estimator due to the interference of channel noises. Based on a commonly-accepted Gaussian assumption, an approximate minimum mean squared error estimator with adaptive weights is derived by a Bayesian inference approach. The approximate estimator convexly combines the estimates for both transmission and no transmission cases, and the weights are adaptively updated according to the received data. Further, the proposed estimator behaves like the Kalman filtering with intermittent observations under two extreme situations. Finally, the a posteriori distribution of the estimation process is analyzed when the remote estimator knows the triggering decisions. Numerical results demonstrate that the performance of our estimator is comparable to those that know the triggering decisions, and also better than the detection-based estimator.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available