4.3 Article

Identifying neurodevelopmental disabilities from nationalised preschool health check

Journal

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 57, Issue 8, Pages 1140-1149

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/00048674231151606

Keywords

Paediatrics; neurodevelopment; mental health; screening; childhood; prediction

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine whether combining multiple screening measures could improve the prediction of neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDDs) in preschool children. The results showed that a composite model combining the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, the Parental Evaluation of Developmental Status, vision screening, and biological sex had excellent predictive power compared to existing referral pathways. The composite model also improved sensitivity in NDD diagnosis detection without reducing specificity. Therefore, using a composite model that combines multiple screening measures can significantly improve the identification of preschool children with NDDs and provide them with academic, personal, and family support.
Objective: Models of psychometric screening to identify individuals with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDDs) have had limited success. In Aotearoa/New Zealand, routine developmental surveillance of preschool children is undertaken using the Before School Check (B4SC), which includes psychometric and physical health screening instruments. This study aimed to determine whether combining multiple screening measures could improve the prediction of NDDs. Methods: Linked administrative health data were used to identify NDDs, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability, within a multi-year national cohort of children who undertook the B4SC. Cox proportional hazards models, with different combinations of potential predictors, were used to predict onset of a NDD. Harrell's c-statistic for composite models were compared with a model representing recommended cutoff psychometric scores for referral in New Zealand. Results: Data were examined for 287,754 children, and NDDs were identified in 10,953 (3.8%). The best-performing composite model combining the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, the Parental Evaluation of Developmental Status, vision screening and biological sex had 'excellent' predictive power (C-statistic: 0.83) compared with existing referral pathways which had 'poor' predictive power (C-statistic: 0.68). In addition, the composite model was able to improve the sensitivity of NDD diagnosis detection by 13% without any reduction in specificity. Conclusions: Combination of B4SC screening measures using composite modelling could lead to significantly improved identification of preschool children with NDDs when compared with surveillance that rely on individual psychometric test results alone. This may optimise access to academic, personal and family support for children with NDDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available