4.4 Article

Cold Oxygenated Machine Perfusion Improves Functional Survival of Slaughterhouse Porcine Hearts

Journal

ASAIO JOURNAL
Volume 69, Issue 8, Pages 774-781

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001955

Keywords

slaughterhouse porcine hearts; cold oxygenated machine perfusion; ex vivo heart perfusion; working heart model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of cold oxygenated machine perfusion on functional myocardial survival in slaughterhouse porcine hearts compared to static cold storage. The results of this study showed that the survival rate in the cold oxygenated machine perfusion group was significantly higher than that in the static cold storage group.
The aim of our study was to explore the effect of cold oxygenated machine perfusion in slaughterhouse porcine hearts on functional myocardial survival compared to static cold storage (SCS). Seventeen hearts were harvested from Dutch Landrace Hybrid pigs, which were sacrificed for human consumption and randomly assigned to the 4 hours SCS group (N = 10) or the 4 hours cold oxygenated machine perfusion group (N = 7). Hearts were perfused with a homemade Heart Solution with a perfusion pressure of 20-25 mm Hg to achieve a coronary flow between 100 and 200 ml/minute. After 4 hours of preservation, all hearts were functionally assessed during 4 hours on a normothermic, oxygenated diluted whole blood (1:2) loaded heart model. Survival was defined by a cardiac output above 3 L with a mean aortic pressure above 60 mm Hg. Survival was significantly better in the cold oxygenated machine perfusion group, where 100% of the hearts reached the 4 hours end-point, as compared with 30% in the SCS group (p = 0.006). Interestingly, warm ischemic time was inversely related to survival in the SCS group with a correlation coefficient of -0.754 (p = 0.012). Cold oxygenated machine perfusion improves survival of the slaughterhouse porcine heart.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available