4.5 Article

Hygrothermoelastic analysis of non-simple nano-beam induced by ramp-type heating

Journal

ARCHIVE OF APPLIED MECHANICS
Volume 93, Issue 9, Pages 3379-3393

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-023-02444-x

Keywords

Hygrothermoelasticity; Non-simple nano-beam; Finite Fourier transform; Euler-Bernoulli equation; Ramp-type heating

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effects of coupled temperature and moisture in a non-simple nano-beam subjected to hygrothermal loading using a two-temperature hygrothermoelastic model. The hygrothermal distribution of an Euler-Bernoulli beam with a rectangular cross-section is analyzed. A closed-form solution for temperature, moisture, displacement, and hygrothermal stresses is obtained using decoupling and integral transform methods. A numerical example is calculated to illustrate the effect of the ramping time parameter in the hygrothermal field with porous composite material at the picoseconds scale. The study examines the relevance of various characteristics and provides appropriate discussions and conclusions.
This study investigates a two-temperature hygrothermoelastic model to describe the effects of coupled temperature and moisture in a non-simple nano-beam subjected to hygrothermal loading. This paper analyses the hygrothermal distribution of an Euler-Bernoulli beam with a rectangular cross-section beam. A closed-form solution for temperature, moisture, displacement and hygrothermal stresses is obtained using the decoupling and integral transform methods along the thickness direction. A numerical example with porous composite material in the picoseconds scale has been calculated to illustrate the effect of the ramping time parameter within the hygrothermal field. The relevance of the influence of various characteristics is examined. The appropriate discussions and conclusions are reached.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available