4.5 Article

Investigation on the influence of compact tensile specimen thickness on the dynamic fracture properties

Journal

ARCHIVE OF APPLIED MECHANICS
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages 2243-2251

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-023-02423-2

Keywords

Aluminum alloys; Hopkinson tensile bar; Dynamic fracture toughness; Plane strain

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the experimental-simulation combination method based on the split Hopkinson tensile bar test, the fracture behavior of 2A12-T4 aluminum alloy compact tensile specimens was investigated in this study. By comparing with experimental results, the numerical approach was validated, and the influence of specimen thickness was analyzed. It was found that the J-integral curves increase exponentially with time, and specimens of different thickness exhibit similar variation patterns. With increasing thickness, the dominant factor changes from the plane stress area to the plane strain area, and the J-integral value first increases and then decreases to a constant value. The percentage of the plane strain area in the total thickness was derived.
Based on the split Hopkinson tensile bar (SHTP) test method, the fracture behavior of the 2A12-T4 aluminum alloy compact tensile (CT) specimens has been investigated using experimental-simulation combination method in this paper. Upon validating the numerical approach by comparing with experimental results, the influence of specimen thickness has been analyzed. It is found that the J-integral curves are increasing exponentially with time, and specimens of different thickness have similar variation laws. With the increase of thickness, the dominant factor changes from plane stress area to plane strain area, and the J-integral value first increases and then decreases to a constant value at last. The percentage of plane strain area in the total thickness has been derived.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available