4.7 Article

Ergonomic evaluation of thermal comfort for different outlet distribution patterns and ventilation conditions in the pilot protective helmet

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 226, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.120355

Keywords

Pilot protective helmet; Ventilation; Thermal comfort; Head skin temperature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the thermal comfort of a pilot protective helmet by conducting CFD simulation and experiments. The results show that outlet distribution patterns B and D can lower head skin temperature and improve thermal comfort. By extending the testing parameters and improving the testing accuracy, this study contributes to the existing literature on head thermal comfort evaluation.
Ergonomic evaluation of thermal comfort is critical for heat stress alleviation systems in the pilot protective helmet, which is few investigated by existing approaches. In this study, CFD simulation under three ventilation pressure differences (60, 160, 260 Pa) and 4 outlet distribution patterns (ODP) was performed. Participants (n = 10) wearing the pilot protective helmet with a ventilation system were exposed to a constant thermal envi-ronment, while head skin temperature, subjective thermal sensation and comfort scales and relative humidity were measured. In simulation, head skin temperature changed oppositely to ventilation air pressure differences and increased due to the electronic module. Mean and maximum head skin temperatures were lower under ODP B and D. In experiments, head skin temperature was significantly lower after ventilation of 4 ODPs, while ODP B served optimal cooling effect. This study adds to the existing literature on head thermal comfort evaluation by extending the testing parameters and improving the testing accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available