4.4 Article

The relative contribution of photons and positrons to skin dose in the handling of PET radiopharmaceuticals

Journal

APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110705

Keywords

Skin dose; Positrons; PET radiopharmaceuticals; Manipulation of radionuclides

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to demonstrate that not using shielding when manipulating PET radiopharmaceuticals does not properly consider the contribution of positrons to the dose. Skin doses were calculated for syringes filled with different PET radiopharmaceuticals using the Varskin+ code. The results show that the dose due to positrons is the principal component of skin irradiation.
Background: Despite recommendations to use syringe and vial shields to reduce exposure of the hands of staff when manipulating PET radiopharmaceuticals, operators sometimes prefer to work without shields, believing that the faster handling limits the equivalent dose. The aim of this work is to show that this approach does not properly consider the contribution of positrons to the dose. Materials and methods: Using the Varskin+ code, skin doses were calculated for syringes of various sizes, filled with 18F, 11C or 68Ga solution. Syringes without shielding, or shielded with 2 mm and 10 mm of tungsten were considered. Results: Dose rate values in mSv/s per MBq, averaged on a 1 cm2 surface at a depth of 0.07 mm were calculated for all the above conditions. For example, in the case of 3 mL 18F syringe at 1 mm from the skin, the dose rate without shielding is 1.32E-02 and 8.63E-04 for positrons and photons respectively. For 11C, the corresponding dose rates are 4.70E-02 and 8.90E-04 respectively, and for 68Ga, 8.52E-02 and 9.48E-04. Conclusions: Our results show that the dose due to positrons is the principal component of skin irradiation, by a factor of 3-100, depending on the conditions. The use of shields for syringes and vials is necessary to avoid unjustified skin exposures, that may challenge dose limits. In our opinion, automatic systems for dispensing and allowing injection with shielded syringes, or automatic injectors, are economically justified and should be adopted in PET.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available