4.5 Article

LiDAR-assisted accuracy improvement strategy for binocular visual measurement

Journal

APPLIED OPTICS
Volume 62, Issue 9, Pages 2178-2187

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/AO.476605

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a novel LiDAR-assisted accuracy improvement strategy for binocular visual measurement is proposed. Calibration between LiDAR and binocular camera is achieved by aligning 3D points cloud and 2D images using the Perspective-n-Point (PNP) algorithm. A nonlinear optimization function and depth-optimization strategy are established to reduce the error of binocular depth. Experimental results demonstrate that our strategy can improve the depth accuracy of binocular visual measurement compared to three stereo matching methods, with the mean error decreasing from 33.46% to 1.70% at different distances.
The measurement model of binocular vision is inaccurate when the measurement distance is much different from the calibration distance, which affects its practicality. To tackle this challenge, we proposed what we believe to be a novel LiDAR-assisted accuracy improvement strategy for binocular visual measurement. First, the 3D points cloud and 2D images were aligned by the Perspective-n-Point (PNP) algorithm to realize calibration between LiDAR and binocular camera. Then, we established a nonlinear optimization function and proposed a depth-optimization strategy to lessen the error of binocular depth. Finally, the size measurement model of binocular vision based on the optimized depth is built to verify the effectiveness of our strategy. The experimental results show that our strategy can improve the depth accuracy compared to three stereo matching methods. The mean error of binocular visual measurement decreased from 33.46% to 1.70% at different distances. This paper provides an effective strategy for improving the measurement accuracy of binocular vision at different distances.(c) 2023 Optica Publishing Group

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available