4.8 Article

Analysis of control strategies in alternating current preheating of lithium-ion cell

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 333, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120533

Keywords

Alternating current preheating; Lithium-deposition-free; Control strategy; Negative electrode potential; Full cell impedance; Terminal voltage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Among the three control strategies (TVCS, NEPCS, FCICS) proposed to prevent lithium deposition during alternating current preheating, this paper analyzed their applicability boundaries by measuring the electrochemical impedance spectrum (EIS) of a three-electrode model cell at different temperatures and SOC. The results showed that both TVCS and NEPCS had limitations, leading to either lithium deposition or exceeding the cut-off voltage. Based on the analysis, a strategy combining NEPCS and TVCS was proposed to control the terminal voltage without lithium deposition.
Among various methods of preheating lithium-ion cells at low temperatures, alternating current preheating (ACP) has the advantage of high efficiency. However, the risk of lithium deposition exists when using the ACP method. To prevent lithium deposition, terminal voltage control strategy (TVCS), negative electrode potential control strategy (NEPCS) and full cell impedance control strategy (FCICS) are proposed. However, each of the three control strategies has limitations. In this paper, the applicability boundaries of the three control strategies (TVCS, NEPCS, FCICS) are analyzed by measuring the electrochemical impedance spectrum (EIS) of a three-electrode model cell at different temperatures and state-of-charge (SOC). The results show that TVCS leads to lithium deposition when the frequency is lower than boundary frequency, while NEPCS leads to the terminal voltage exceeding the cut-off voltage when the frequency is higher than boundary frequency. As for FCICS, when the SOC is 100 %, 75 %, 50 % and 25 %, the heat generation is decreased by 8.61 % -34.5 %, 9.18 -51.7 %, 6.49 -40.7 % and 8.61 -61.4 %, respectively, compared with NEPCS. Moreover, the applicability boundary obtained by FCICS also leads to the terminal voltage exceeding the cut-off voltage. Based on the above analysis, this paper proposes a strategy to control the terminal voltage without lithium deposition. When the frequency is lower than the boundary frequency, NEPCS is employed, and when the frequency is higher than the boundary frequency, TVCS is employed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available