4.8 Article

Oxygen vacancy-induced spin polarization of tungsten oxide nanowires for efficient photocatalytic reduction and immobilization of uranium(VI) under simulated solar light

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 324, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122202

Keywords

Tungsten oxide; Oxygen vacancies; Uranium; Photocatalytic reduction; Spin polarization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tungsten oxide nanowires (WO3_x) with rich oxygen vacancies (OVs) were prepared through a hydrothermal method, demonstrating high adsorption capacity and photocatalytic activity. The WO3_x successfully removed 95.1% of U(VI) at pH 5, with 79.9% being transformed to U(IV) for reductive immobilization. Compared to conventional WO3, WO3_x exhibited narrower band gap energy, higher charge carrier separation, and faster transfer rates, attributed to its construction of oxygen vacancies.
Tungsten oxide nanowires (WO3_x) with rich oxygen vacancies (OVs) were fabricated through a facile hydro-thermal method, which had both high adsorptive capability and photocatalytic activity. 95.1% of total U(VI) (C0 = 10 mg/L) was removed by WO3_ x at pH 5, and 79.9% was transformed to U(IV) to achieve reductive immobilization after photocatalysis under simulated solar light. Band structure and optical characterizations indicated WO3_x had narrower band gap energy, but higher charger carrier separation and transfer rates compared with conventional WO3. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations further demonstrate the spin polarization state electrons of W 5d in WO3_x due to the construction of OVs, thus greatly inhibiting recombi-nation of electron-hole pairs. In addition, the electron density increases in WO3_x and the photogenerated e- in the conduction band of WO3_x has higher reduction ability than WO3, leading to more efficient electron transfer from WO3_x to UO22+ after photo-excitation for U(VI) reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available