4.8 Article

Mapping a thermodynamic stability window to prevent detrimental reactions during CO2 electrolysis in solid oxide electrolysis cells

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 324, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.122239

Keywords

Carbon deposition; Carbon dioxide fixation; Thermodynamic analysis; Nickel oxidation; Solid oxide electrolysis cell

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preventing Ni oxidation and carbon deposition in CO2 electrolysis is a critical challenge for solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs). This study reveals that the Nernst voltage, in relation to the operating voltage, controls these reactions and enables the establishment of a reaction phase diagram. The successful demonstration of pure CO2 electrolysis without Ni oxidation and carbon deposition is achieved in Ni-based cathode supported SOECs.
Preventing Ni oxidation and carbon deposition, regarded as two major issues for CO2 electrolysis with conventional Ni-based cathodes, is a critical challenge for the development of solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs). However, the origin of these two detrimental reactions remains unclear. Here, we unveil that the Nernst voltage, in relation to the operating voltage applied to the SOEC, is the determining factor in controlling these electrochemical reactions. This insight enables the establishment of a reaction phase diagram that identifies the temperature-dependent operating voltage window where both Ni oxidation and carbon deposition can be avoided. We construct this reaction phase diagram based on the results of experiments and a thermodynamic model, and we validate it at a typical reaction condition (cathode: CO2, 1 atm; anode: air, 1 atm; temperature: 800 degrees C). As a result, pure CO2 electrolysis in Ni-based cathode supported SOECs is successfully demonstrated without Ni oxidation and carbon deposition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available